View Single Post
Old 02-13-2010, 03:54 PM   #374 (permalink)
vpoppv
The $500 Electric Car
 
vpoppv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cushing,Oklahoma
Posts: 430
Thanks: 6
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
My limited experience with alum batteries is that they are best as stationary batteries running light loads.

They droop in voltage much more almost down to 6v (but come back) and also bubble like an edison battery with probably the same charge efficiency, they also have a fast self discharge rate. They operate at much lower voltages because of the insolubility of the electrolite in solution, however you can run them flat without much issue it seems.

I have tested 3 batteries as alum, the first was junk to begin with and failed with a broken interconnect. The next ended up with a shorted cell (was before too) The 3rd a trojan T-1275 that only had about 30ahr left came back after some cycling 160ahr at 3 amp load, however the under load capacity was much lower and at much lower voltage (hard to guage going from 11.5v to 10.5v). Also I found you needed to use the battery straight after charge to have the best range.

Perhaps I am doing something different, looking at the "old" information it appears alum is to be added to water then mixed in the acid in most old recepies. Sometimes mixed in with cobalt and epsom salts. Perhaps the really good alum batteries have had the owners leave some acid in there, and sludge feeds the alum reaction but it also causes internal shorts which is how most of my batteries have ended up, shorted.

If anyone wants to test alum, go right ahead just make sure you do it on sulphated batteries, not ones with broken cells or broken interconnects. Alum doesn't really work on new batteries or ones that more or less are good.

Alum can potentially increase capacity beyond the original rating but it has the devistating side effect of offering that capacity at a linear discharge down to about half your original voltage. And in my experience only at lighter loads but perhaps my set of batteries were all failures. Some have claimed their alum batteries function at voltages higher than original, not sure how that would happen, would be nice if someone who was good at making sucessfull conversions would show how to do it correctly.

Also I would think EDTA or epsom salts work more reliably as Alum apparently needs a pretty specific situation to work ideally. Good though if the battery is a boat ancor, could at least use them to run lights and actually originally alum batteries were used to run lights, telegraphs and other long use light load applications prior to 1905. (one guy linked a book from 1899 describing an alum powered telegraph) So no we aren't crazy, there were alum batteries very early on but obviously had some problems or we would be using them now.

Cheers
Ryan
I am still using one alum battery in my pack, and it seems to follow exactly what you are describing. Honestly, once I find a suitable replacement battery, I will be removing it from the pack. However, given that it was not working so well anymore as a lead/acid, it is no real loss. Also, as you say, it has the advantage of being able to discharge very low without fear of damage. As a lead/acid, it was degrading progressively every day. Since the conversion, its performance has been increasing (it gains 1/100 of a volt per day).

Edit: I just scored 2 more group 31 batteries. That makes 5 for the Toyota, plus 3 group 27s. I was planning on 72v, but if it ends up at 96v, so be it. Who am I to argue with the battery Gods?

Last edited by vpoppv; 02-14-2010 at 07:05 PM..
  Reply With Quote