View Single Post
Old 02-17-2010, 08:53 PM   #76 (permalink)
oldbeaver
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chile
Posts: 223

Mercedes 89 D - '89 Mercedes 300 E
90 day: 33.86 mpg (US)

Skodie - '09 Skoda Octavia TDI PD
90 day: 38.84 mpg (US)

1993 Mercedes 300D Turbo - '93 Mercedes Benz 300D Turbo W124
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Crossie - '16 Subaru XV Crosstreak
90 day: 9.61 mpg (US)

Crossie - '16 Subaru XV Crosstreak
90 day: 33.34 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
0.6 improvement with HHO measured with Mpguino?

Accordingly to Stonebreaker, even a 0.6% improvement on engine yield is not possible.

On the other hand, if it is possible, then it may be a matter of efficiency of the electrolysis machine used. This machine yielded 0.6% improvement, but maybe other may yield more improvement?

And what about the Turkish paper cited by Tangomar? It claims a very serious improvement on 4 cars using onboard HHO generation. The only difference of the method is precisely the electrolysis machine used: they used electrodes made of Carbon and Platinum instead of stainless steel.

However, the paper do not say clearly how they measure fuel consumption. If it is a diesel engine, it si not an easy task.

Oldbeaver
  Reply With Quote