View Single Post
Old 02-24-2010, 06:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Correlation between predicted and real-world fe?

Thought of this when commenting on the Zoltar Miracle Trike:

The Ecomodder fe prediction spreadsheet is a wonderful tool- takes a lot of onerous calculations away! But one limitation of it is, the values given are valid for steady-state, super calm and perfect conditions. As an example, I plug in the values for my Sport Coupe and get what I think are realistic predicted fe values at the steady state speeds, but tank-to-tank proven fe never matches that (nor should it) due to the real world getting in the way.

So I looked at it a bit and it seems in the case of my Sport Coupe I have to knock 10-15% off the predicted fe to get the real world fe.

That is with normal attentive conservative driving, not extreme P&G, of course.

I wonder if that 10-15% correction factor is valid for everyone else's predicted/real fe too?

__________________


  Reply With Quote