View Single Post
Old 02-27-2010, 02:51 PM   #27 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
looks like

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimepting View Post
Phil, bit hard to tell. Was the radiator intake below the stagnation point on the front. I see that the engine compartment was vented to the windwhield "pocket." Looks like a superb setup to minimize radiator drag and windshield stagnation.
I'm away from home so I don't have my own photos to look at,and I can't remember ( hey at my age I'm authorized now ) but it looks like the area below the lowest slat is open right at the stagnation point,and then they've opened up the area,snagging more air with the additional slats/louvers.
Remember,this was a 'track' car,and operated at W.O.T. for hours/days at the Nardo,Italy track.
Daimler would have been very concerned with engine cooling,operating at the ragged edge for so long.
In day to day operation,the car would never require this amount of cooling air.
At Bonneville,My CRX ran with the temp gauge nearly pegged,so I know this is an issue.
As to the cooling system itself,it is exactly what Walter Korff was pushing in 1963,and it also happens to be what put Wunibald Kamm on the map.The energized flow going over the windshield helped to keep the air from stalling which allowed his roofline to work.
And a safety note: Should a radiator or AC condenser explode ( I've experienced this 3-times ) the hot gases from the cooling system will hit dew-point on your windshield,condense,blind you,and you will in all likelihood crash.The gases from the ruptured AC unit will outright blind you.
It's my opinion that the safety risk of this type of mod overshadows any aero benefit.
Maybe better to move the heat-exchangers rearward as in the Ford concept cars.
  Reply With Quote