View Single Post
Old 03-06-2010, 11:40 AM   #16 (permalink)
comptiger5000
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
The better for fewer cylinders, however, is usually because 4 cylinders usually come in smaller, more efficient cars. Put a 4 cylinder in an H2, the gas mileage won't get any better.

Also, the throttle detent spring helps primarily at cruise, so you can maintain a steady, light throttle to hold speed. The load theory works, that's why P&G works better than steady state. You can spend less time accelerating, but at a faster rate, keeping the engine in a more efficient part of the BSFC map. Then, you can coast and repeat. This is better than running a lightly loaded engine constantly.

With diesels, however, the fuel consumption is far more linear with load, so while more load (around 75-85%) is still more efficient, the difference is less.
  Reply With Quote