"...I titled the thread "Aero Beauty and innovation" and not Aero, Beauty and Innovation"
"I have bee looking at 20's and 30's Bugatti cars recently and realizing how aerodynamic they were."
Sorry, comma or no comma, that looks like a claim that these cars are/were aero.
And when I tried to apply some logic to that claim, the response was to throw gas on the fire.
And there we are.
If your intention was to say "Bugatti's were
styled to look sleek" or "Art Deco" then that's what you would have said, right?