Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com - View Single Post - Differences between CRX HF with/without FFS

oldertech · 03-13-2010, 11:20 PM

I was looking on fueleconomy.gov at the 1987 Honda HF and noticed there are two versions. One being FFS and one without that designation. I read that FFS is like a feedback system on the carb that meters the fuel like later fuel injection. But what I wonder is why there were two versions in most every year of the CRX? Do they follow a California/49state difference like my Honda VX? And finally, how do you recognize the difference if you are shopping for a CRX? On the fueleconomy.gov, I see the FFS is much higher in MPG.

Thanks

03-13-2010, 11:20 PM	#1 (permalink)
oldertech OldertechGuy Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Topeka, Kansas Posts: 51 Scott'sTxVx - '92 Honda Civic VX 90 day: 48.7 mpg (US) Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Differences between CRX HF with/without FFS I was looking on fueleconomy.gov at the 1987 Honda HF and noticed there are two versions. One being FFS and one without that designation. I read that FFS is like a feedback system on the carb that meters the fuel like later fuel injection. But what I wonder is why there were two versions in most every year of the CRX? Do they follow a California/49state difference like my Honda VX? And finally, how do you recognize the difference if you are shopping for a CRX? On the fueleconomy.gov, I see the FFS is much higher in MPG. Thanks