Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com - View Single Post

Christ · 03-18-2010, 11:13 PM

Even if the hydraulic drive is less efficient than a manual or automatic transmission, it doesn't matter.

You can't consider a specific driveline part when the dynamics of the drive system are changed. With a hydraulic drive system, the fueled engine runs at it's most efficient RPM/load ALL THE TIME. Your car doesn't do that.

Even if the hydraulic setup were only 70% efficient, it would probably (most likely) still beat anything on the market currently, provided it would actually be built and work.

03-18-2010, 11:13 PM	#7 (permalink)
Christ Moderate your Moderation. Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Troy, Pa. Posts: 8,919 Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US) Thanks: 1,369 Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts	Even if the hydraulic drive is less efficient than a manual or automatic transmission, it doesn't matter. You can't consider a specific driveline part when the dynamics of the drive system are changed. With a hydraulic drive system, the fueled engine runs at it's most efficient RPM/load ALL THE TIME. Your car doesn't do that. Even if the hydraulic setup were only 70% efficient, it would probably (most likely) still beat anything on the market currently, provided it would actually be built and work. __________________ "¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"