View Single Post
Old 03-29-2008, 03:26 PM   #14 (permalink)
AndrewJ
Awesomeness personified
 
AndrewJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 642

Harold - '94 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 54.51 mpg (US)

Margot - '08 Surly Big Dummy
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
Send a message via AIM to AndrewJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Cd View Post
That would mean that Andrews' .Cd would actually be even lower than he says ( which would make him happy I would think. )
You'd think correctly

While I'd be thrilled to know that a stock 5thGen hatch (non VX) has a Cd of .31, I'm not gonna put any money on it.

Here are the numbers I've seen:
0.33
0.32
0.31

We all know that the VX has slightly better aero with the passenger mirror delete and the rear undertray thingie, so that's where (I belive) the 0.31 is coming from.

So that leaves .32 and .33 for the non VX 5th gen's.

Personally, I'd tend to be a bit more conservative, so I'd go with .33 for the rest of the 5th gen hatches.

Either way, it's all just semantics. Figuring out your EXACT Cd isn't going to make your car any more (or less) aerodynamic.
It just gives you a starting point from which to improve
__________________
"I got 350 heads on a 305 engine. I get 10 miles to the gallon. I ain't got no good intentions." - The Drive By Truckers.

  Reply With Quote