View Single Post
Old 04-10-2010, 01:18 PM   #13 (permalink)
Domman56
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
Why wouldn't a turbo, if properly set up, increase efficiency? Follow the air/exhaust flow: energy is used to suck air into the engine. In the cylinder it's compressed, ignited, and comes out the exhaust port hot and under some pressure. The turbo takes some of the otherwise wasted energy in the hot exhaust, and uses it to push the intake air into the engine, which means no pumping loss. That'd seem to equate to a more efficient engine, wouldn't it?
I have to agree with this. Especialy reading the article about the Turbo cars being more efficient than their NA counterparts, A turbo is run soley off of the exhaust So all it does is make FREE power , By free i mean it doesn't drain anything from the motor, Like a supercharger does.

It's a highly plausibe way to add Fuel economy to your car

I say go for it
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote