View Single Post
Old 04-16-2010, 12:21 AM   #25 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I wouldn't rule out making it front wheel drive because of it being too hard.

Simply use the original 5 speed tranny with the motorcyle engine, and then you will be using the existing design when it comes to driving the front wheels. And with the lesser HP torque steer is irrelevant.

You could attatch the drivechains of both engines to a common drive shaft that would then go to the transaxle. When shifting, you could use the car gears, or make it where you can use the motorcyle transmission in the cab and essentially you could have a multitude of gearing ratios. If you want to disengage one engine, use the clutch cable to dissengage one engine from the system and have a way to lock the clutch into the dissengaged position. If I'm not mistaken, the thrust bearing on a motorcyle is immersed in oil so there shouldn't be any extra wear due to the clutch being disengaged for extended periods of time.

It also takes some of the guesswork out, since you are reengineering less of the car.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.

Last edited by ShadeTreeMech; 04-16-2010 at 12:26 AM.. Reason: clarity
  Reply With Quote