View Single Post
Old 05-01-2010, 12:04 PM   #4 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
That's funny, I would have never thought that 11% would be considered a slight uptick in economy. From what i understand they did 3 sets of runs, one with the car stock, one with the car covered in clay and undimpled, and the last with the dimples. From what I understand, each set consisted of 5 "laps" I guess you could say.

I agree that a lot of what they do doesn't cover all the variables. But golf balls do have dimples for a reason, so why couldn't the theory be applied to something larger?
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote