View Single Post
Old 05-04-2010, 09:43 AM   #5 (permalink)
PaleMelanesian
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwebb View Post
as per the auto speed article
wider is better , for FE and every thing else as well
except drag
I'm pretty sure drag = lower FE.


The rims are heavier, due to being wider. Also, the weight is farther from the center, which has a CUBIC effect on drag. Ignoring the spokes and extra width, 17" rims have 20% more inertia resisting your accelerating force, compared to 16" rims.

I'd guess these are "sport" compound tires, good for grip but bad for FE. My brother's Mazda3 ran through the OEM tires in about 25,000 miles, which is a good sign of soft sticky rubber.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles

Last edited by PaleMelanesian; 05-05-2010 at 09:32 AM..
  Reply With Quote