View Single Post
Old 05-17-2010, 05:57 PM   #88 (permalink)
PaleMelanesian
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
The window sticker on your 96 civic is based on the old EPA mileage test and totally irrelevant to this comparison. By the current standards your civic is rated at 26/33mpg. The 35mpg standard applies to an average for city and highway driving. Your 96 doesn't even come close to meeting 2016 CAFE requirement. It is not rated at 41mpg by any standard.
Wrong. That 31 I quoted is the new, adjusted-for-2008 rating. 28/35 mpg.

Here's the reference for the 41 mpg cafe rating. The fourth Civic listed:
Quote:
CIVIC $ 515 (33 38 35) city/hwy/cmb window sticker, (37 49 41) CAFE, 97( 1.6L) / 4(FFS) FWD M5 OD
And other years are here: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/download.shtml

There are three ratings here:
The raw dyno test numbers, which are used for CAFE. (41 for my car)
The 1985-2007 adjusted numbers. (35 for my car)
The 2008+ numbers, which are adjusted twice from the actual test results. (31 for my car)
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles

Last edited by PaleMelanesian; 05-17-2010 at 06:26 PM..
  Reply With Quote