View Single Post
Old 05-18-2010, 04:38 PM   #42 (permalink)
NiHaoMike
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 632
Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
which room temperature superconductors?
90% of what? not 64 hp. .0000003 hp?

.0000003 hp is gonna drive us to room temperature superconductors?!?

I'm completely lost here.
The amount of power you'll get is dependent on the Q factor of the resonant circuit. Using superconductors will allow you to get a very high Q factor and thus a lot of power received, even at a distance.

Using technology commonly available today, it's already possible to set up a fixed collector antenna (no superconductors, just common metals) near an AM radio station, then rectify the energy and use it to make hydrogen. (And then possibly use the hydrogen to power cars, but fuel cells are currently too expensive.) Or put the rectified energy back into the grid and charge EVs the conventional way.

So maybe we shouldn't think about putting radio energy receivers in cars yet. Instead, someone should set up rectifying antennas near AM radio stations and recover the energy to power EVs with. (Assuming, of course, that it is not possible to shut the transmitters down.)
__________________
If America manages to eliminate obesity, we would save as much fuel as if every American were to stop driving for three days every year. To be slender like Tiffany Yep is to be a real hypermiler...

Allie Moore and I have a combined carbon footprint much smaller than that of one average American...
  Reply With Quote