View Single Post
Old 05-19-2010, 02:57 PM   #16 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
The frontal area of the bug has nothing to do with the Cd...

and everything to do with the CdA.

The whole bug could be downsized 25% or 57% or 81.4% and the Cd would remain unchanged.

IMHO they had a shape they wanted to use and simply scaled it so that it enclosed the mechanicals and interior capacity parameters they wanted.

They (or someone) acknowledge that there is excess width due (solely?) to the bodywork enclosing the front wheels.

Why they didn't simply articulate some front skirts to knock that width/frontal area down is beyond me...
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Joggernot (11-14-2015)