View Single Post
Old 05-22-2010, 10:53 AM   #20 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
How does the EGR affect engine performance/economy? I don't know.

But if it works correctly it reduces NOx, otherwise known as smog, which is a bad thing to pump into the atmosphere for everyone to breathe.

I was born in LA county, California and in the late 70s smog was BAD (add as much emphasis as possible!!!) It resulted in me getting asthma as a baby. Mysteriously, being moved to Arkansas (very little smog due to lack of congestion) has put the asthma down as a footnote of my life, not something i have to deal with. And with cali's strict regulations, smog is nearly nonexistant now.

the design of the EGR is to reduce smog. So if I want to get an extra 1 mpg, i'll lighten up on the throttle or use some better oil but the only thing I'll ever do to an EGR system is repair it back to OEM specs.

Is 1 mpg really more important than taking the chance of poisoning our air with NOx? Wouldn't that be considered selfish if it was?
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ShadeTreeMech For This Useful Post:
roflwaffle (04-07-2011)