View Single Post
Old 05-23-2010, 11:49 PM   #86 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
what's that law concerning the physics of a body in motion? Something that says you cannot extract energy from a moving object and expect the energy to not run out?

Otherwise I'd have had a half dozen windmills with alternators hooked up to the top of the car.

I do think it would be cool to have a vehicle that used electrical generation as its sole source of slowing down the vehicle. Imagine using a generator being spun very fast from the coating energy of a car to stop it. Done right, I'm sure it's physically possible, and that would certainly recharge the batteries a bit, especially if going downhill.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote