View Single Post
Old 05-26-2010, 02:47 PM   #23 (permalink)
texanidiot25
Master EcoModder
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 331

Formula - '96 Firebird Formula/Trans-Am
90 day: 19.31 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 31 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
The problem with the "why don't the car companies build them lower" is that through the SUV marketing and so on, they've got a large share of the public convinced that it wants to "sit up high". Look at the smaller, supposedly build for fuel economy models: they stick up like over-filled muffins. Compare for instance Honda CRX with Smart Fortwo.
I'm not sure if you're talking about vehicle hight or ride height, but the ride height on my '87 CRX is very similar to current hot hatches, and the over all height is lower, but I'd certainly like another inch or so for a better driving position. Also, the Smart 4-2 looks taller than it really is due it it's silly-shot wheel base, it has very odd proportions.
__________________


Lets see how far it can go

"All I know about music is that not many people ever really hear it. [...] But the man who creates the music is hearing something else, is dealing with the roar rising from the void and imposing order on it as it hits the air. What is evoked in him, then, is of another order, more terrible because it has no words, and triumphant, too, for the same reason. And his triumph, when he triumphs, is ours." -Sonny's Blues
  Reply With Quote