True, lubrication and cooling changes for vapor are neccessary
thats right.
The 376 mpg demo is interesting. I don't know of
other vapor conversions but I know many don't end
well.
My understanding of all the failures with implementations
of vapour injection is that the engine overheats because
there is no combustion chamber cooling system.
The 1900's might have the answer to that one and
what they did back then was use water injection instead
of liquid fuel to control the temperature in the combustion
chamber.
I'm very sure that water-injection can replace the
cooling ability of liquid fuel and control cylinder temperatures.
I personally do not care if I am using more water in my
car than petrol.
I'm thinking that maybe vapour might be good for idling
and coasting, and then if I need power, then allow the
fuel injectors to spray only when and if I actually need
some power.
Temperature control is vital. Actually the car I am using
has uses too much fuel and gets too hot. So all of this
thinking just comes with trying to fix the current problems
I want my car to run at 60% of its current temperature.
That's my goal. I'm told it will be more efficient.
|