View Single Post
Old 04-05-2008, 01:32 AM   #60 (permalink)
LostCause
Liberti
 
LostCause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California
Posts: 504

Thunderbird - '96 Ford Thunderbird
90 day: 27.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTFM8 View Post
I know this serves to prove very little, but there are more efficient ways to haul a large group around than a suburban.
Very true and another thing to consider is how impractical it is to fill up a vehicle to full occupancy. Getting 4 passengers together is a lot easier than getting 7 passengers together. Therefore, a lower occupancy vehicle will be more likely to operate at peak efficiency than a higher occupancy vehicle.

High occupancy also kills the value of a car...personal freedom.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris D. View Post
do you mean Miles Per Tank? MPT?
He means MPG per person. For example: a bus that gets 5 MPG and carries 30 people will have the same overall efficiency as a single-occupant car getting 150 MPG.

5 MPG x 30 people = 150 Persons MPG
150MPG x 1 person = 150 Persons MPG

While a bus gets less mileage, it can carry more people over a given distance. If passenger miles are what really matters, then basing efficiency in passenger miles is a more realistic assessment of a vehicles overall efficiency. You can see a single-occupancy vehicle is actually pretty inefficient.

Clear as mud?

- LostCause

Last edited by LostCause; 04-05-2008 at 01:39 AM..
  Reply With Quote