View Single Post
Old 06-17-2010, 10:11 AM   #14 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I would be suprised if his diesel had an injection pump that you could adjust. Looks like it may be a commonrail injection which would be controlled by the computer. Not adjustable without some sort of computer.

I'd block off the intercooler to simply see if it does anything for your economy first before you possibly cock up a good car.

In consideration of the two engines seeming to be identical, woudln't simply getting the right parts be the best route? Might have to just change out the ECU and put in the wiring once you get the valve.

To be quite honest, I would put doubts on this helping economy at all. You would be warming up the air a fair bit, but simply staying away from the go pedal would accomplish the same goal. What's the listed economy figures for the 2 vehicles? I somehow think the newer one may be less efficient.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.

Last edited by ShadeTreeMech; 06-17-2010 at 10:20 AM..
  Reply With Quote