Thread: Cheap DIY EFIE
View Single Post
Old 06-26-2010, 04:38 PM   #23 (permalink)
Olympiadis
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
If my college chemistry from close to 10 years ago is accurate, running leaner allows a higher o2 to fuel ratio, resulting in a hotter flame, regardless of heat transferrence.

Another example is the theory behind the EGR system, which injects a low O2 gas into the combustion process to lower EGTs.
All things being equal you are correct. In the varying conditions of actual engine operation there are a few more factors that affect burn speed in the chamber.

Being a combustion buffer, EGR will slow burn speed, the end result being a cooler combustion process and lower efficiency under most driving conditions, especially those requiring more engine power.

This EFIE trick can prove to be somewhat effective overall, but as has been said, a narrow-band O2 is not good at toggling at anything other than stoich, which would make this method problematic, and "touchy" to adjust.
Running this EFIE in combination with an active EGR system will also reduce its effectiveness at improving FE. A lean AFR combined with EGR flow will lower the AFR at which you reach the lean-misfire threshold, and thus limiting your fuel savings.

Burn speed will increase up to a point of enleanment, often around 15.8:1 (assuming no EGR) AFR or so, but will then start to decrease again. This (going leaner than 15.8:1 AFR) won't be an overall negative if it is only done during periods of low engine loading where little power is needed. This simple EFIE device doesn't operate based on engine load, so that is the key to making it work for you.
You could try to get fancy and make a circuit that would vary the output based on load, or you could use a 2-step system resistance that would switch between two settings based on a load threshold.

You will find that you can get away with 17.0:1 AFR or higher at very low engine load, like DECEL, or idling while coasting, and not kill the engine or worry about damaging anything.
At a higher load, like a steady cruise you'll probably find that you need to stick closer to the range around 15.8:1 AFR.

Using a WBO2 to monitor the AFR will be very helpful for getting your EFIE to perform.
  Reply With Quote