I'm on the fence on this one.
I certainly understand not wanting more noise pollution, a genuine concern.
But I see pedestrian safety as a huge concern (i.e. life or death). It isn't their choice when someone blows a light and hits them, even though the walk signal says go. How many times are driver and pedestrian both not paying attention to the right things anyway?
Stuff happens, a bit of noise might keep a kid from running out in the street, whatever.
It isn't a simple thing, driving is a privilege, walking is a right. I think over-simplifying it and mixing in emotional (I want my car the way I want it damnit!!) responses is not going to get to the right answer though. Things could/should be more pedestrian and bike friendly, their rights should not be compromised by the privileged, who will "win" in most any encounter, or at least tie.
I can drive the city without my headlights off and reduce light pollution. So I should be allowed to do so, right?
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|