View Single Post
Old 07-10-2010, 01:04 PM   #136 (permalink)
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
I agree a positive displacement pump would be ideal and likely more efficient.

The weed wacker engine is an interesting one. Too bad I just gave away my old one haha.

With positive displacement pumps you have a problem with how to lubricate it. Any ideas how to solve that?

I still like the turbine idea because its super simple (besides making the turbine, which I do think a DIYer can do). RPM would definitely be something you'd need to test to get right. You'd have to select a range of PSI that would be useful and if it dropped below that close the jet to rebuild pressure. Of course, we may have to do that with a positive displacement pump too... I dunno, I still just like the simplicity. Less moving parts, no friction, no maintenance basically.

Anyone know how industrial power generators work? Most power plants use heat to make steam to generate power.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote