View Single Post
Old 07-12-2010, 04:44 PM   #57 (permalink)
bnmorgan
16 Ferret Circus
 
bnmorgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ecru, Mississippi
Posts: 95

GrumblyDavidson - '00 Harley Davidson Road King FLHRP-I
90 day: 38.37 mpg (US)

Golf - '04 Volkswagen Golf GL-TDI
90 day: 38.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
ok, typical new guy question here: would keeping the airflow attached until further down or around the car be better or worse? for instance, in the picture of the NB showing separation and turbulence behind the front fender, and again at the crest of the rear fender, and at the base of the rear glass in that large "box" area that pretty much IS the rear of the car. Would keeping that air attached be better or worse for fuel economy. Or instead would filling that area somehow to relieve the low pressure and "bubble" being dragged along help more?

I think i can figure out how to help keep it attached if i just know if it's beneficial to do so. I don't need downforce, i need slipstreams.

also wonder what the reynolds number for this is. I was trying to use the flow illustrator just to see what there is to see.
__________________



the e30 is dead

Last edited by bnmorgan; 07-12-2010 at 05:51 PM.. Reason: added question
  Reply With Quote