View Single Post
Old 07-22-2010, 02:27 PM   #12 (permalink)
cfg83
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
Laurentiu -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laurentiu View Post
Source : www.guardian.co.uk


Of course this article speaks by itself of how much pollution is spewed by these gargantuan sea-monsters but the angle that I want to look at is how come EPA in the US is so stringent on Diesel engined cars/vehicles yet seems to be doing nothing significant about the pollution coming from shipping.

Any thoughts ?
I see this as being similar to the "SUV loophole". One reason SUVs were attractive to automakers was that they were classified as trucks for use as "farm equipment". In the interest of commerce "farm equipment" doesn't have to meet the same emission standards as passenger cars (so SUVs cost less to make and increase profit margins). This also makes sense in agricultural communities that have fewer cars and people per acre than urban centers. I think the same logic would apply to shipping vessels.

I would also guess that it's more difficult to enact and enforce emissions standards on international waters.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society

Last edited by cfg83; 07-22-2010 at 04:16 PM..
  Reply With Quote