View Single Post
Old 08-04-2010, 06:56 PM   #18 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfguy2000 View Post
It seems to me that the effects of wind drag would be more dramatic on a vehicle trying to go uphill. I think extremely slow in a lower gear would give the engine a better mechanical advantage, but you would have to go pretty slow.
I can see no reason why aerodynamic drag would be more severe just because one is going up hill.

Mechanical advantage does not imply better use of energy (efficiency). On what principle of physics would going as slow as possible up a hill be the most efficient?

As far as I know, the only significant downside to driving fast is aero drag (assuming an engine at optimal rpm and throttle setting).
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote