View Single Post
Old 04-10-2008, 07:34 PM   #12 (permalink)
LostCause
Liberti
 
LostCause's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California
Posts: 504

Thunderbird - '96 Ford Thunderbird
90 day: 27.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Minimizing waste is always a noble task, but I don't see a very pressing need for a reuseable filter.

A normal filter should last 30,000 miles. Cars probably average 150,000 miles during their lifetime, so 5 filters (@ $8 each) will total $40.

Someone who blows compressed air backwards through the filter (being sure to seal off the engine side from contamination) could probably run their filter 45,000-60,000 miles. At 150,000 miles, 3-4 filters (@ $8 each) totals $24-$32.

What about waste? 3-4 airfilters is very minimal waste to begin with (6 x 8 x 1.5 inch box) and they are made of paper. I don't see why an airfilter cannot be recycled, at least the paper element (which is >80% by volume).

For those who visit dusty sites, then a low efficiency, cheap, removable plastic pre-filter would help keep the primary filter clean. Interesting conversation, though. I would be interested in an efficient, reuseable filter if they did become available.

- LostCause
  Reply With Quote