View Single Post
Old 08-27-2010, 01:39 PM   #16 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,442

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jammer View Post
I swear every pump I see around here claims 10% Alcohol, I honestly thought it all was tied to some Federal mandate to get Americans off of oil- by slowly increasing the amount of alcohol in our "gas".

I must concur that the small gas engines seem to be running the worse on this e10 stuff. Does raising the octave from 87 up higher really help any with small econo-box engines?
Minimum ethanol requirements are mostly mandated at the state level. Oregon and Washington mandate E10, and I noticed a sharp decrease in mpg once the changeover occurred.

Running a higher octane than what your engine was engineered for will not help anything. I always recommend running the minimum octane that your engine is rated for. For example, Acura recommends I run 92 PON, but the minimum required is 87 PON. I run 87 and surprisingly, do not notice a decrease in mileage. Since my timing is computer controlled, I do not have pinging or any other symptoms of running a low octane.

FYI- ethanol contains ~2/3 of the amount of energy as gasoline. This means an engine running 100% ethanol would get only 66% of the MPG that a gasoline engine would.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote