View Single Post
Old 09-05-2010, 06:27 AM   #121 (permalink)
AJI
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 129

Rallye - '98 Peugeot 106 Rallye
90 day: 36.36 mpg (US)

RX-7 - '94 Mazda RX-7
90 day: 16.87 mpg (US)

NC - '09 Mazda MX-5
90 day: 33.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
You would think that but the data suggests that there are other things that may have more impact. I've tried to catalog them here:

Barry's Tire Tech
Thanks, interesting reading. To me though, that "tast 4 results" graph showing 235 section tires with six pounds more rolling resistance force than the 175 section tires is quite a difference. The effect of tire width on resistance is fairly easy to demonstrate.

Dump the clutch in a car on narrow tires and then try the same car with fatter tires and it's fairly clear which one has the more resistance (/friction). Fatter tires would make for more rolling resistance and aero drag I would think, by all normal rules of physics. Obviously compound matters too, but like-for-like the narrower tires would have less rolling resistance.

__________________
  Reply With Quote