View Single Post
Old 09-09-2010, 01:09 PM   #18 (permalink)
robertwb70
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 135

1991 RED Metro 1.0 Auto - '91 Geo Metro Lsi Auto
Team Metro
90 day: 38.28 mpg (US)

1991 3/5 2 door Blue/green - '91 Geo Metro
Last 3: 42.6 mpg (US)
Thanks: 54
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Agreed about the trailing wake not being 100% of frontal area I'd estimate for most cars it is still about 80% of frontal area though, so lets use a 25 SF frontal area example.
25 SF * 5280 * 0.80 = 105,600 CFM

Since we want to cruise (60 MPH to match above) at a low RPM for FE lets say 2,500 RPM and a fairly average size motor 2.0L (0.0706 CF) we get an exhaust output of roughly 88 CFM so the turbo would have to add 1200% more CFM for 100% fill, I don't think that's even close to being possible.

Considering 100% fill is probably not necessary for a sizable FE gain probably still wouldn't get us anywhere near reality, even at 50% it's still 600% more than engine exhaust needed from the compressor side of the turbo.
  Reply With Quote