View Single Post
Old 09-12-2010, 01:34 AM   #14 (permalink)
comptiger5000
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
That sounds like a pretty good explanation. However, wouldn't accessory losses count more at high rpm, where they're spinning faster, and frictional losses, as well as pumping losses (in the power steering pump) are greater?
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote