View Single Post
Old 09-14-2010, 11:21 PM   #20 (permalink)
redyaris
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 744

redyaris - '07 Toyota Yaris
Team Toyota
90 day: 45.54 mpg (US)

Gray - '07 Suzuki GS500 F
Motorcycle
90 day: 70.4 mpg (US)

streamliner1 - '83 Honda VT500 streamliner
Motorcycle
90 day: 75.63 mpg (US)

White Whale - '12 Sprinter 2500 Cargo Van
90 day: 22.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 81
Thanked 75 Times in 67 Posts
Before the aero mods I could get as good as 67mpg at 53mph average speed and at 75mph average speed I would get 57mpg. after the aero mode I get 67mpg at 75mph and 71mpg at 63mph. At this stage I do not have a large enough sample size to be confident of my numbers. I am using the trend in my fuel log as my test, so until the number of entries gets to about 30 or so with a strong trend line I won't be sure. By some peoples standard this is not a very good test of aeromods, however my objective is fuel economy so this method works for my perposes.
On your cbr600 I would agree with you that a gearing change would help fuel economy. However you would have to accept a loss of acceleration and top speed in 6th gear. On my GS500F after the aeromods and gearing changes, one of the things I notice is I need less throatle to maintain speed on the highway at 75mph. The other thing I notice is that top gear acceleration is better than before the mods. These are subjective so a grain of salt is in order, until the sample size on my fuel log is large enough, and the average fuel consumption is better.
  Reply With Quote