View Single Post
Old 09-28-2010, 12:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
superchow
Master of 140 hamsters
 
superchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 183

Hamster - '07 Honda Civic EX
90 day: 29.41 mpg (US)

Whooshy Wagon - '04 Volvo V40
90 day: 23.33 mpg (US)

Minotaur - '09 Ford Taurus X SEL
90 day: 19.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
I recently test drove the 2011 Outback with the CVT. I am a stick-shift kinda guy all the way, and even converted my wife to preferring sticks - but this CVT felt great. It really depends what kind of driving you'll be doing. If you cruise the highways into the wilderness, then I'd stick to the CVT. If city driving is your bread and butter, the stick may yield better results.

I personally was in awe of the 1600-1700 rpm going 65 mph down the highway. 35 mpg is a realistic number at those rpms.

Plus, for the manual control aspect - the transmission comes with paddle shifters and a manual gate on the shifter. So anytime you need to "drop a gear", a flick with the left paddle and the CVT simulates a lower gear for engine braking.

I'd say test drive both versions and see what fits your needs better. Oh, and kindly let us know what you decided! BTW: an updated engine is coming to Subaru within the next year or so. They claim slightly better mileage...
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to superchow For This Useful Post:
bmwboarder (09-28-2010)