View Single Post
Old 10-05-2010, 10:35 PM   #21 (permalink)
user removed
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
http://www.innas.com/CFPE.html

DOE papers 10 years ago stated 58%.

Add a transonic injection system.

Transonic Combustion | Our Technology | TSCi Technology - Fuel Injection Systems

Now an accumulator at 98%

And one of these in each wheel, with infinitely variable displacement


http://www.youtube.com/user/Ride122609


There is your complete power train, with a huge reduction in power train parts count.


That's technology available right now, not some predicted development in the next decade.

Do a parts count on the moving parts in that free piston engine.

Of course I like my rotary flywheel engine better, with variable displacement and compression and no parts moving rapidly in opposite directions.


regards
Mech

  Reply With Quote