View Single Post
Old 10-08-2010, 09:39 PM   #56 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I've figured out how he could have a "free" lunch.

Get a couple deep cycle batteries put in the car. Install a switch to turn off the alternator while driving. And charge the batteries with a windmill/ solar panel array.

Were it not for the likelihood of extreme low efficiencies of air flow to power, this could have been a good idea. I think you would have to be a commuter traveling around 75-80 average for a long time for this to have any viability.

I consider talldude a friend, so I hope he realizes sometimes this forum is a good place for inserting a dose of reality into ideas that may not work as well as hoped.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote