View Single Post
Old 10-09-2010, 05:05 PM   #55 (permalink)
redyaris
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 744

redyaris - '07 Toyota Yaris
Team Toyota
90 day: 45.54 mpg (US)

Gray - '07 Suzuki GS500 F
Motorcycle
90 day: 70.4 mpg (US)

streamliner1 - '83 Honda VT500 streamliner
Motorcycle
90 day: 75.63 mpg (US)

White Whale - '12 Sprinter 2500 Cargo Van
90 day: 22.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 81
Thanked 75 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
You know, I agree (pretty much) with what you say, but most of it is still irrelevant to the subject, which is the economic benefits of MODS, not original choice of car or driving style. Those have to be thought of in the same way as other performance mods, a hobby on which you expect to spend money :-)
Although thinking about ecomods "...in the same way as other performance mods, a hobby on which you expect to spend money." is valid it ends up as a single factor argument, or "reductio ad absurdom"[reduced to the point of absurdety] of economic thought. We also expect to spend money on food, housing, transportation, clothes, utilities, investments and... As I see it we need to evaluate economic benifits from more than one perspective. That is why even though ecomoding has only a small return on investment, it also has an insulating effect on futur price rise, as well as makeing the activity [motorized personal transportation...] more sustainable. So if we add up the verious economic benefits [return on investment + insulation from price rise + sustaneability + ...] we see that the activity seems more and more economicaly rational, even though it may never achieve perfection.

Last edited by redyaris; 10-09-2010 at 05:15 PM..
  Reply With Quote