View Single Post
Old 11-18-2010, 10:59 AM   #38 (permalink)
tim3058
EcoModding Apprentice
 
tim3058's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 147

Silver Bullet - '86 Chevy Camaro Z28
90 day: 19.74 mpg (US)

New Blue - '96 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
90 day: 20.46 mpg (US)

Diesel - '96 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
Last 3: 13.56 mpg (US)

Tahoe #2 - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
90 day: 13.05 mpg (US)

SuperDuty - '08 Ford F-350 dually Lariat
90 day: 9.34 mpg (US)

Fundai - '09 Hyundai Elantra
90 day: 26.45 mpg (US)

HRV - '17 Honda HRV LX
90 day: 31.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdb View Post
Let those who ride, decide.

As long as they also pay for those decisions, in the form of higher insurance rates etc.
Agreed. Totally agree with Frank too, just another example of nanny gov't. If a biker goes down at 65 on the freeway, a helmet does little or nothing, only in the (rare) incident the only impact occured on the top of the head, with no spinal injury. If a biker wants to wear a helmet he is free to do so, if not, why is it anyones business but his? Doesn't mean he is stupid, maybe he enjoys it enough to merit the added risk. How can a (stupid) politician know what each biker values most? But if I as the gov't tell you its the law to wear a helmet, wear a seatbelt, use daytime running lights, etc, before too long you will give up any other rights I want to take.
As I've said before, I get wary when gov't tries to restrict others freedoms, else it may be my turn someday.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tim3058 For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (11-18-2010)