Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com - View Single Post

Daox · 11-18-2010, 03:51 PM

I'd say a traditional turbo location is most efficient. It is positioned up front to get the most boost as quickly as possible. If you move it back, you reduce the amount of power it captures.

11-18-2010, 03:51 PM	#20 (permalink)
Daox Administrator Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Germantown, WI Posts: 11,203 CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E 90 day: 51.49 mpg (US) Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius Team Toyota 90 day: 49.53 mpg (US) Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight 90 day: 64.33 mpg (US) Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE Mitsubishi 90 day: 56.69 mpg (US) Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt Thanks: 2,501 Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts	I'd say a traditional turbo location is most efficient. It is positioned up front to get the most boost as quickly as possible. If you move it back, you reduce the amount of power it captures. __________________ Current project: A better alternator delete