View Single Post
Old 11-27-2010, 09:20 AM   #8 (permalink)
comptiger5000
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
It's going to be easier to swap engines. Destroking yours is a lot of work, and without re-tuning the intake manifold, cam and such, you'll lose pretty much all low-end torque, leading to no gains in FE, but a loss in power.

If you want to keep the same car, your best bet is taller gearing. A large engine with lots of low-end torque kept at low rpm will do just as well, or possibly better in some cases, than a smaller engine revving higher to do the same work.
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote