View Single Post
Old 11-28-2010, 12:31 PM   #20 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I did think of the weight of tank(s) but I was thinking of the reduced size primary tank (weight savings) and not only that, small tanks like that don't weigh much anyway, but since I was not going to go out and weigh any tanks before posting, I didn't include any estimate for that. Throw another 30 lbs in there then and calc the fe destruction.

BTW, we went through that little odds thing already didn't we? What I did is a legit way of presentation. If you think dual tanks are inherently stupid/dangerous, maybe you should direct your ire towards Ford Motor Co., as my F150 has them stock.
__________________


  Reply With Quote