View Single Post
Old 12-08-2010, 02:54 PM   #19 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,636

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,550
Thanked 3,426 Times in 2,151 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BamZipPow View Post

I guess it could be lowered...but what is the ideal angle of the cap? I guess the angle would be some where between 10 and 15 based on the calculations I performed earlier.

I guess I could make the next version from this to an adjustable angle to see what would be ideal. Obviously if I want that to happen, I'll have to keep spare side panels available to adjust the cap angle to...
I think we fall into a trap sometimes when quoting an "ideal angle" for a trailing surface. I think it depends on the other geometry around it. For instance, since yours has such a smooth organic taper rather than a sort of 2-D slice off an airfoil profile, I think the angle can be steeper- like how the EV1 backlight is steeper than our "ideal" aero template.

If you can make it adjustable and do tuft tests, that would be the best way to optimize that angle, moreso than us sitting around theorizing about it.
__________________


  Reply With Quote