Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
Hi,
Remember, that human caused global climate change was proposed and tested in 1896. I hope you can watch the videos -- they are in command of a staggering amount of information.
|
I love Neil's choice of words: "they are in command of..." Again, the words used are the couched in the language of politics and coercion. That's no coincidence. Considering the relentless stream of videos Neil keeps offering, he is either a paid propagandist or an unpaid zealot.
Quote:
|
One of the men testifying works for the Cato Institute and he is a doubter, and he is conveniently forgetting to include important factors, and therefore is not credible.
|
Yes! Anyone who understands politics knows that the Cato Institute is persona non grata and anathema to Leftists: Liberals/Socialists. In Neil's world "doubters" are "not credible" - entirely because they have
doubts!!!
This is their concept of the "NEW" science: no doubting allowed.
Newspeak. Welcome to "1984" - even if it is late in arrival, by 26 years or so.
Quote:
|
In the congressional testimony which is very recent, they speak about the many, many considerations (all of them that have been proposed?) that they have studied and modeled and tested; and they have concluded that humans are causing the current warming. There is no other explanation.
|
Yep. Gotta eradicate those pesky humans. Or at least take away their ability to use fuel and cause the "current warming". At the very least let's deport all humans to tropical jungles (oh, excuse my political incorrectness for calling them
jungles, I need to say it in newspeak: "
raain forests") where they can swelter in the heat and be reduced to primitive existence. then Eaarth will revert to being Nirvaanaa.
Quote:
|
Here's Secretary Chu speaking about this and related subjects
|
To hell with Secretary Chu. I'd just as soon listen to Chairman Maao. (Unfortunately he's pushing up daaisies.
)
And on
Eaarth the sheeple just say "BAA, BAA, BAA!"