View Single Post
Old 12-14-2010, 10:28 AM   #13 (permalink)
NeilBlanchard
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
And there is more friction losses with poppet valves, by definition -- you have to work against the springs, and the springs lose some energy, and there is more friction as the valve closes. Rotary valves have spherical moving parts and if they are precisely fitted, they will have much lower losses.

Judging by this animation:

http://www.coatesengine.com/rotary_motor.html

The piston needs to be domed and possibly made to fit into the recesses of the valves? It might be that the valves could be cylinders; instead of truncated spheres? This would shrink the space about the piston at TDC, I think.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 12-14-2010 at 10:37 AM..
  Reply With Quote