View Single Post
Old 04-22-2008, 08:43 PM   #6 (permalink)
cfg83
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 531 Times in 357 Posts
dremd -

This consistent with my impression, Jack of all trades and master of none. The SGII is dependent on the *implementation* of the OBDII standard by the auto manufacturer. I think that because there are fewer diesels on the road, they may have more "esoteric" implementations. Do you know what I mean?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
You are not alone my friend. I too have this exact same problem with the TDI. I think the way the SG computes consumption for the TDI is flawed and is only accurate if you always drive in the exact same manner you did when you calibrated it.

...
This also makes sense because from my POV, the calibration value is a "constant" based on how you drove your previous tank. Change the way you drive, and the constant loses validity. If you have a "reliable" commute that is consistent over time, the SG calibration is fine.

PS - I am not complaining about the SG. It is a fantastic relative barometer of fuel consumption. But I think we need to understand it's limitations.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote