View Single Post
Old 12-24-2010, 02:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
ShadeTreeMech
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
lowering a front wheel drive car may not be the best idea in the world. The geometry of the lower a arm, the stress on the bushings, and the position of the cv axles and related wear would all change.

I would think the less expensive option, and the best for the longevity of the car, is to think on continuing the lowering trend all around the car, or get a belly pan put in. especially with those narrow tires, height is irrelevant to economy assuming the air flowing underneath is dealt with expertly.

For a good solid backing, I would go with a sheet of roll steel to sister behind the lawn edging. I believe it is sold as flashing at Home Depot, and is roughly the correct width. It would stregthen the lawn edging over the entire length, and would be nearly invisible to the exterior.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote