View Single Post
Old 12-27-2010, 11:05 PM   #12 (permalink)
Jim-Bob
Junkyard Engineer
 
Jim-Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 167

Super-Metro! - '92 Geo Metro Base

$250 Pizza Delivery Car - '91 Geo Metro Base
Team Metro
90 day: 43.75 mpg (US)

Fronty the wonder truck - '98 Nissan Frontier XE
Thanks: 7
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
If maximum mileage for the minimum price is what you seek, a Geo Metro is what you need. They are available in a 4 door and so long as you get a 3 cylinder with a 5 speed it is hard NOT to get 40 mpg out of one. You could also look for a Civic VX or the very reliable B13/B14 Sentra with the GA16DE/5 speed too. The Sentras are worth 30+ MPG city if in a good state of tune and they have timing chains, not belts. Typically you can expect a Sentra that is well maintained to be capable of 300k+ miles due to the high nickel engine block, forged crank and rods and timing chain. I am not a huge fan of Civics because the engines tend to be more fragile than the ones used in Sentras, but the VX's lean burn engine makes it worth the risk as they get almost the same mileage as a 3 cylinder Metro.

For prices, Metros can be anywhere from damn near free up to $5,000-depending on where you find them. I paid $250 for my 1991 3/5 4 door and it runs and drives. My 1992 3/auto 2 door was $350 and it needs an engine. Both my cars were Craigslist finds and were listed as needing work or as parts cars. However, the important thing with a Metro is not the engine ( they are cheap to go through) but the chassis. You need to check them over VERY carefully for rot in the front where the lower control arms bolts to. I would also shy away from an automatic car unless you have a 5 speed parts car. The automatics give up 10-15 mpg to the 5 speeds and can be expensive to change over (around $300). However, if all you can find without rot is an automatic, take it and try to get a 5 speed parts car.
__________________
No green technology will ever make a substantive environmental impact until it is economically viable for most people to use it. This must be from a reduction in net cost of the new technology, not an increase in the cost of the old technology through taxation



(Note: the car sees 100% city driving and is EPA rated at 37 mpg city)
  Reply With Quote