View Single Post
Old 01-03-2011, 01:42 PM   #111 (permalink)
cfg83
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
dcb -

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
I don't think the cab analogy holds up. Those checkers were huge, i.e. 5000 lbs. Lightweight is best for stop and go, as well as clutch life.

They drove huge gas guzzlers for comfort, and the auto trans probably was smoother for passengers and they had a larger pool of drivers to choose from, economy wasn't a large concern. That's reason enough for a cab business.
The other thing that's nagging in the back of my mind is that you have a larger worker pool to draw from if you only have automatics.

Would a trucker analogy be more appropriate, aka where MPG has a bigger impact on profit?!?!?

CarloSW2

__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society

Last edited by cfg83; 01-03-2011 at 01:56 PM..
  Reply With Quote