View Single Post
Old 01-04-2011, 04:13 PM   #102 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clev View Post
There's no reason why the 2.3L shouldn't be able to tow 4,000 pounds and get 30 mpg unloaded, but they specifically put in a lighter duty manual transmission with the 4-banger, as well as going light on the suspension parts, because they want to keep pushing the big trucks.
Which is pretty much what my '88 Toyota does. 4 cyl, 2.3 liter engine, 3500 lb tow rating, averages 26-27 mpg - and that's with 4WD, and mostly driven with loads or on really rough dirt.

I agree that a lot of it is down to the manufacturers and their often-mistaken ideas of profit maximization. They can sell larger trucks (or big cars & SUVs) at a higher profit margin (plus avoiding all sorts of inconvenient regulations), so they think they can make more money overall by selling only big trucks. But what happens instead is that a lot of people who might be willing to buy a new small truck are instead buying the '80s Toyotas and the like. So in fact they've lost business.
  Reply With Quote